by Addison Wiggin & Ian Mathias

  • U.S. GDP skyrockets… how our struggling nation managed to double economic growth
  • But government includes a quiet revision… economy contracted last year for first time since the tech bust
  • Ahead of tomorrow’s jobs report, one employment indicator that’s tellin’ it like it is!
  • Stock market stages solid rally, famous stock picker calls for the bottom
  • Finally, someone musters the stones to sue the ratings agencies
  • Plus, The 5’s hit a nerve… the population control debate flares up in our 5 Min inbox

  U.S. economic growth doubled in the second quarter of 2008, says the government today. Doubled… as in twice as much. 

That’s what the bean counters claim this morning… the latest GDP report shows the U.S. economy grew at a 1.9% annual rate in the second quarter, more than double the anemic 0.9% growth rate in the first quarter. Word on the street is that stimulus checks and a better-than-usual trade deficit were behind the sudden boost. How the printing of $150 billion in free money and our $400 billion annual trade deficit cause economic growth… well… this editor doesn’t get it.

You’d think Wall Street would rejoice on the news, but economists were expecting an even higher GDP reading. Just two weeks ago, the consensus forecast for today’s report came in around 1.8%. Somehow, expectations grew to 2.3% by this morning (what country do these people live in?), and thus, the Street is in a sour mood today. More on that in a minute.

  But there was one believable nugget in today’s GDP report. The Commerce Department quietly “unannounced” GDP growth in the last quarter of 2007. The government revised previous reports of 0.6% fourth-quarter growth down to a 0.2% contraction.

That’s the first quarter of “negative growth” since the third quarter of 2001, when the economy was in recession.

  “The story now will go along the lines,” speculates John Williams , “that the economy dipped a little in the fourth quarter — not enough to be called a recession — and has been in recovery ever since. Despite sharp quarterly contractions in employment, industrial production, new orders, real retail sales and residential construction, among other series, the second-quarter 2008 GDP was reported as booming. (Net of inventory reductions, the inflation-adjusted economy expanded at an above-average annualized 3.9% rate.)

“Such is an absurdity, given the reporting of better-quality surveys and extremely strong anecdotal evidence to the contrary. But the reporting will enable the pushing off of any recession recognition until after the election.”

While economic growth in the U.S. is reported to be strengthening, the U.S. employment scene, as John mentioned, is still lousy. A healthier GDP report this morning may have overshadowed the exceptionally bad weekly jobless claims report. Initial jobless claims over the last week alone skyrocketed by 44,000, to 448,000, claims. That’s the worst such report since 2003. For what it’s worth, the four-week moving average is a monthly gain of around 393,00 claims.

We’ll get the "official" jobs report from the Labor Department on Friday. Today’s jobless claims stand in stark contrast to yesterday’s positive ADP report… we’ll see where the government draws the line tomorrow.

  And check out this chart from today’s New York Times:

Call us crazy, but that looks like a damn good indicator of economic recession.

The paper reports that over 3.7 million Americans have had their full-time jobs converted to part time because of weak business conditions. That’s the biggest involuntary part-time population of that kind since the Fed started keeping track in 1955. The total number of those forced into part time — for any reason — has now swelled to 3.7% of the work force, up from 3% last year.

  The market, for once, appears to be seeing the forest for the trees. As we write, major market indexes are down… mostly due to the GDP missing forecasts and the gloomy jobless claims report. Exxon Mobil occupies the spotlight today, as the company once again announced record-setting revenues. Naturally, the stock is being sold off… the Street wanted more than a 40% increase in annual revenue.

“Falling production: That’s the real story,” says our bloggin’ brother Dave Gonigam at the Desidooru Saloon . While most of the media is racing to figure out some cute anecdote to mock Exxon’s enormous earnings (like $1,485 profits a second), Dave’s found a snippet from the earnings release worth noting.

“Production is down 7.8%, thanks to Hugo Chavez’s oil field grab in Venezuela, strikes in Nigeria and contracts with foreign governments that give them a bigger cut of output as oil prices rise.”  That poses some serious questions as to the future of “big oil’s” production growth.

“But only the record profits will get any play today,” says Dave. “Falling production?  Shrinking margins? Those are off limits for discussion.”

  It’s also worth noting that some of the selling pressure in the U.S. market today is due to the remarkable rallies we’ve enjoyed lately. For the week, the S&P is up 2.5%… not bad for a bear market.

  Thus, "I’m sticking my neck out and calling the bottom," declared Jim Cramer on his show last night. We normally don’t pay much attention to Cramer, but it’s worth noting… the country’s most “popular” financial adviser says the worst is over.

  No one told the ladies and gents at Deutsche Bank the worst was behind us… the German mega-bank announced a 64% crash in profits and a $3.6 billion write-down today.

"Looking forward, we remain cautious for the remainder of 2008,” said CEO Josef Ackermann. “We will continue to strictly manage cost, risk and capital, and to reduce our exposures in key areas.”

  It’s about time… the state of Connecticut is suing Moody’s, S&P and Fitch. Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said the ratings agencies “systematically and intentionally" gave certain corporations (read: financials) unreasonably high credit ratings while giving the shaft to more stable public entities, like the state of Connecticut. We’re certainly not advocates of frivolous lawsuits, but these guys have it coming.

The ratings industry was “not concerned about what it knew to be more accurate and fair ratings,” said Blumenthal. “It was concerned about whether use of those fair and accurate ratings would be good for its bottom line… We are holding the credit rating agencies accountable for a secret Wall Street tax on Main Street: millions of dollars illegally exacted from Connecticut taxpayers.”

  Oil jumped $4 yesterday. Light sweet crude rose to $126 after the Energy Dept. announced a surprise decline in gasoline supplies… temporarily defying the idea that demand in the U.S. is waning. Overnight, we learned that Iran is refusing to give up its nuclear aspirations, and, thus, crude is holding steady as we write.

  Gasoline continued to fall, however. The national average is now $3.90 a gallon, well off its $4.11 high set on July 17.

  No huge news on the dollar front. The dollar index is holding around 73.3, as it has since Tuesday.

   As such, the gold trade is pretty thin, as well. The spot price has bounced from its $895 low yesterday to about $915 today.

"I bought my first gold last week, and I hate gold,” confessed GMO’s perpetually bearish investment guru Jeremy Grantham. “It doesn’t pay a dividend. I would only do it if I was desperate." You might recall Grantham’s forecast last year of a “global bubble” about to pop. While that still might be a bit of a dramatic prediction, we’d say he’s closer to being right than wrong.

  “Global overpopulation is a great topic!” exclaims a reader, responding to yesterday’s reader mail. “Most people understand the world is a finite place and cannot infinitely support an infinite number of people. Population control is THE KEY to turning around the fight for resources that we are already beginning to see terrible results from. How much more poverty, famine and war do we need to see? Positive long-term results for all of mankind will begin to occur only once this issue is universally dealt with. But organized religions with their ancient, man-made, shortsighted, stubborn, outdated and often flawed beliefs are retarding serious progress with this issue. Ironically, organized religions are at least partially to blame for nearly all the differences that cause conflict among people, in the name of morality. It truly is insane when you step back and look at it.
 
“Until there is a logical argument showing the positive long-term benefits of uncontrolled reproduction, it seems we ought to be working on this issue more than we are.”

  “So someone finally broached the real reason for the worldwide calamity of soaring prices for commodities, water and food etc.,” claims another. “Indiscriminate overbreeding has lead to gross overpopulation of the planet by at least a billion and a half. And the best comment you come out with is ‘Now you have.’

“You, obviously, want to remain politically correct. This is not a subject that should be hidden. People having more than one or two kids for self-perpetuation are greedy thieves stealing the valuable resources of Mother Earth and destroying our habitat. In the old days of depopulating diseases and wars, overbreeding was needed to keep the human race going. That thought should have been quelled years ago when studies showed the largest population the Earth could still comfortably support to be around 5 billion.

“That fact has now been shown to be dramatically understated! Too many people encourage companies to strip away resources full tilt without any thought of replacing, or at least recycling, them in a sensible manner without polluting the world. Waste is rampant and unnecessary. Adding more and more “I WANTS” to this problem is criminal and should start being treated as such. If we want a planet to live on, we need to be proactive and get the population down! (If it’s not already too late.)”

The 5: Eh… if you’re familiar with The 5, being consistently politically correct is not one of our virtues. We held our tongue yesterday because this is a whole lot to tackle in 5 Min., and we wanted to see how you’d respond. Plus, we share the sympathies of this reader:

  “Hard to argue with that one, except that there are at least two problems,” says our last reader. “Most people enjoy having children, and will (selfishly?) reproduce, no matter what. And even a static population would translate into zero or negative growth for the economic system that we all know and love. In other words, it wouldn’t work (not that it really works all that well now). Does anyone know of an economic system not reliant on (unsustainable) growth? It’s hard to even think that one is possible, human nature being what it is. No wonder no one talks about it.”

The 5: This editor can’t see the overpopulation issue gaining any political traction until it’s much, much too late… if at all. Most people wouldn’t even vote for Ron Paul’s sobering campaign. How bad would it have to be for a “stop having babies” ticket make it to Pennsylvania Avenue?

  “There are just too many of us!” shouts our last reader. “But since no politician in his right mind will ever go about doing anything in terms of enacting birth control (with doubtful results even in nondemocratic China), and since we do not run into the sea as the lemmings do every once in a while, we cannot but hope that sooner, rather than later a catastrophic natural disaster (meteor impact, earthquake) will strike us and wipe out a good billion of us (I don’t care where) and allow for a fresh start.”

You must be a popular dinner party guest.

Ian Mathias
The 5 Min. Forecast

P.S. Your opportunity to save a bunch of money on Bulletin Board Elite expires tonight. BBE’s one-year anniversary has come and gone, so we’re about to put the kibosh on our heavily discounted subscription fee. If you’re interested in banking big gains by buying very small stocks, this is a great chance to get in on the cheap. Learn more about our discount, here. Offer expires at midnight tonight.  

Share and Enjoy:
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • BlogMemes Sp
  • blogtercimlap
  • co.mments
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Fark
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • Netscape
  • NewsVine
  • PlugIM
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb

Comments

8 Responses to “Two GDP Suprises, Two Scary Employment Indicators, Two Guru Market Forecasts, and More!”

  1. multigrain on July 31st, 2008 5:19 pm

    Wow! I didn’t realize there were so many “population control” whack jobs reading the 5!

    Once again, show me a place where people think “big population” is a problem and I’ll show a place like Russia where they have pro-natalist policies… because they think birth rates are too low.

    Get a grip people. Your population control nonsense is just a backwards war on poor people.

    If poorer countries weren’t developing and making the competition for resources more expensive – this is the real reason people are complaining about “big population” – then they would still be poor and hungry but oil would still be “cheap” and nobody in IOUSA would care about “population control”.

    If the above readers are so inclined why don’t they set an example and be the first to volunteer for sterilization. Maybe they’ll be some free Viagra in it for you.

  2. DrillSgtK on August 1st, 2008 8:10 am

    I have found that “selfish” people who have more than two kids tend to be the most giving.

    Those who feel that there are too many people forget a few facts: First the entire world population could be moved to the state of Texas with a population density less than that of NYC per square mile. Second each new person increases the likely hood that they will create the new energy source or recycling technique.

    Take my family, I’m one of seven kids. Of that seven we have two in the medical field, one who designs roads and transport system, a special needs teacher, a small business co-owner, a vet and a state park maintainer. Five volunteer with the Fire/EMS in their towns, one sponsor little league teams, and one is heavily into Horse Rescue. Four served in the military. Most are still working on advanced degrees.

    All are working, most have college degrees, are married, active in church, have more than two kids (or plan to.) One grand kid is in college now studying chemistry, another is severing in the military.

    The one of two in the medical field helped treat the man who invented the chicken nugget and Carl Sagen. Our “highway” designer’s roads have increased highway safety and reduced the amount of fuel used. the small business employes seven full time high school drop outs and three former convicts in good paying jobs.

    Go out one level to my parents and we see three PhD’s, Five Masters of X, two small business owners and one convict. (everyone has a black sheep in the family)

    My kids could be the ones that create a new way to grow food, or improve solar panels to 75% conversion, or write that next great motivation book or cure cancer. Why stop such potential? How would you? line everyone up and shoot every third person?

  3. g60dood on August 1st, 2008 11:53 am

    I didn’t know that chicken nuggets had anything to do with population control.

  4. jeremyliberty on August 1st, 2008 12:51 pm

    Wow! is right.
    It would seem that some of the readers belive something should be done by the government to curb birth rates.
    Isn’t that what Communist China does?
    And isn’t that why there is are more Men than Women in China? Wont that cause a problem in the not so distant future?
    I like what the Drill Sargent up there is saying. Who knows who will develop the plan to get off this rock and onto another planet out there?
    And if population control is so important, lead by example. Walter Block has said it is within your ablilty to reduce the population by one. What’s stopping you?
    Who is really being selfish?
    I know quite a few couples who are not able to have any children. They can adopt, yet most don’t. Maybe the couples who have more than one or two are making up for those who can’t. Just a thought.
    And as far as chicken nuggets…. they have everything to do with population control.
    g60dood, if you had children then you would know that.

  5. g60dood on August 1st, 2008 12:59 pm

    So Jeremy, is one’s understanding of chicken nuggets directly proportional to the amount of children that said person has? If so, I’ll have a dozen of them and then maybe I’ll understand the sweet and sour dipping sauce too. Thanks for clearing things up!

  6. powerpod1 on August 1st, 2008 3:43 pm

    If we organize and stop our government from trying to control every aspect of our lives,there are plenty of resources available. We need LESS interferance and regulations that stop people and small business from developing new products for the benefit of humankind.

    Less bailouts and social welfare for companies and people who don’t know how to manage their money. We[our Gov.] is turning us into a Socialist state by nationalizing these failures and using our tax money to pay for it.

    As for chiken nuggets,feeding them to your children should be outlawed!Your practicing a form of “death” control by increasing their odds of health disorders by eating that crap!

  7. powerpod1 on August 1st, 2008 3:58 pm

    I may be wrong[that happens alot]but I think the main thought being expressed is being able to support bringing a child into this world.Not bringing them into poverty and dispare that happens in many third world countries.
    Just look at all the starvation and destruction in these countries because of that.Stevez

  8. Banks in Peril… Record Fed Lending, Greenspan Forecasts, Commodity Correction, and More! | 5 Min. Forecast on May 4th, 2009 9:54 pm

    [...] we can confirm our usual suspicions about Wednesday’s ADP jobs  report and yesterday’s jobless claims number. In short, if you aim to predict the BLS’ monthly jobs report, ignore the former and heed [...]

Leave a Reply